FISIOVEGEN ULE - Using Plant-Based Preparations to Protect Common Bean

Journal article

A. G. De la Rubia, M. de Castro, Inés Medina-Lozano, P. García-Angulo
Agronomy, 2021

Cite

APA Click to copy
la Rubia, A. G. D., de Castro, M., Medina-Lozano, I., & García-Angulo, P. (2021). Using Plant-Based Preparations to Protect Common Bean against Halo Blight Disease: The Potential of Nettle to Trigger the Immune System. Agronomy.

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Rubia, A. G. De la, M. de Castro, Inés Medina-Lozano, and P. García-Angulo. “Using Plant-Based Preparations to Protect Common Bean against Halo Blight Disease: The Potential of Nettle to Trigger the Immune System.” Agronomy (2021).

MLA Click to copy
la Rubia, A. G. De, et al. “Using Plant-Based Preparations to Protect Common Bean against Halo Blight Disease: The Potential of Nettle to Trigger the Immune System.” Agronomy, 2021.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{a2021a,
  title = {Using Plant-Based Preparations to Protect Common Bean against Halo Blight Disease: The Potential of Nettle to Trigger the Immune System},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Agronomy},
  author = {la Rubia, A. G. De and de Castro, M. and Medina-Lozano, Inés and García-Angulo, P.}
}

Abstract

Halo blight disease of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Pph), is responsible for severe losses in crop production worldwide. As the current agronomic techniques used are not effective, it is necessary to search for new ones which may prevent disease in common bean. In this study, we challenged four plant-based preparations (PBPs), with no other agronomic uses, as they come from industrial waste (grapevine pomace (RG) and hop residue (RH)) or wild plants (Urtica dioica (U) and Equisetum sp. (E)), to be used as immune defense elicitors against Pph in common bean. After studying their inhibitory effect against Pph growth by bioassays, the two most effective PBPs (RG and U) were applied in common bean plants. By measuring the total H2O2, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzymatic activities, as well as the expression of six defense-related genes—PR1, WRKY33, MAPKK, RIN4, and PAL1, it was observed that U-PBP application involved a signaling redox process and the overexpression of all genes, mostly PR1. First infection trials in vitro suggested that the application of U-PBP involved protection against Pph. The elicitation of bean defense with U-PBP involved a decrease in some yield parameters, but without affecting the final production. All these findings suggest a future use of U-PBP to diminish halo blight disease.